Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alchemist (Savant album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR) (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alchemist (Savant album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to have any notability independent from the artist. Can't find any primary sources and doesn't seem to have charted in any countries. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 18:32, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Regarding charts, the album has supposedly reached the top 10 in Finland and Norway, and also reaching #1 on Beatport. I also can find some reviews including this one --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:45, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neither the Norwegian or Finnish charts seem to list that it was ever a top 10 album, unless I'm just not navigating the websites properly. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The album has also supposedly reached #9 of the top 100 in the iTunes US Dance charts and #2 in Bandcamp. Currently looking for a relilable source. I checked the Finnish and Norwegian charts, and I can't find the album or artist. The album could be on a different chart. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:28, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 11:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: when you say "can't find any primary sources", do you in fact mean secondary sources? – filelakeshoe (t / c) 11:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do. I'm not sure how I wrote that so wrong in the first place. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 21:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.