Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albertas Gurskas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust The Homunculus 18:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Albertas Gurskas[edit]

Albertas Gurskas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG horribly. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:59, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep The article was translated from the Lithuanian WP. Though I do not read Lithuanian, the article there seems to have good sources for notability, from what would appear to be a national encyclopedia. There is also a Russian version, poorly sourced, but showing what is probably notability as a designer. It should have been tagged Expand Lithuanian, not listed for deletion DGG ( talk ) 02:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Pure laziness originally from the creator and the nominator. If it "fails GNG horribly" expand and source it. Clearly a notable designer of coins and books.♦ Dr. Blofeld 06:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Lol, do you realize you are the creator? Renata (talk) 17:50, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Of course, otherwise it would look bad me calling the nominator lazy when I didn't add any content or sources initially :-).♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.