Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Victor Olson (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Victor Olson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person seems to lack the notability required to pass WP:BIO since all the sources in the article are primary and I was unable to find anything at all about them that would work for notability when I looked. There was an AfD on the person already that resulted in keep, but it was a while ago and the keep reasons where extremely weak, like "lets keep the article because I want to work on it." Which never seemed to happen. Nothing meaningful about sourcing and notability came up though. Adamant1 (talk) 05:28, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, it appears the bot accidentally posted this twice by posting the old AfD. If anyone knows how to fix it that would be great. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:42, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:39, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NBISHOP guidelines; he isn't Catholic but if he had been the equivalent status would have at least been a bishop.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 03:34, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jack Frost (talk) 00:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The bishop guidelines have never been accepted as actual policy. What we need is 3rd party sources not published by the Church someone is a leader in, and we lack those in this case.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:28, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.