Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Valentine (actor)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Albert Valentine (actor)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Albert Valentine (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not meet WP:NACTOR, as he only had a couple of TV appearances as non-named characters some years ago. Nothing that could be considered a significant role to clear the actor notability guideline. I also performed some searches but nothing came up to satisfy WP:GNG. RetiredDuke (talk) 15:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 17:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: it just cites IMDb. Sources are thin on the ground when it comes to significant coverage, so it looks like he fails WP:NACTOR. SITH (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Typical problem with child actor articles: no significant roles. FOARP (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Definitely fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. -- LACaliNYC✉ 20:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete no reliable sources. Not every actor who has appeared in a TV show is notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Yes, sadly I think this needs deleting Cls14 (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.