Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alanah Rae

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 02:15, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alanah Rae[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability has not been established according to criteria presented at WP:PORNBIO. Has not won awards or been nominated; has not made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre; has not starred in an iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature; is not a member of an industry Hall of Fame such as the AVN Hall of Fame, XRCO Hall of Fame or equivalent; and has not been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media. Therefore, I recommend the deletion of the article. Cindamuse (talk) 08:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although she is a hottie, she still fails notability criteria for pornographic actors. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 09:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I can't find any awards or independent significant coverage to establish notability. Also, if you can't tell, she had her breasts enhanced, so they aren't truly natural. --NortyNort (Holla) 10:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant coverage, thus not very notable. Fails WP:PORNSTAR. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree. I tried to save it, but failed when I could not come up with any awards or significant news coverage. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.