Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Peterson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SK#3. As the nominator has correctly observed, this page is a disambiguation page. No rationale for deleting it has been given. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Alan Peterson[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Alan Peterson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | :(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just a disambiguation of containing the names, Alan Peterson in it, with one having a page that is a stub.
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 17. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: perfectly reasonable disambiguation page distinguishing 4 nameholders who are mentioned in the encyclopedia. PamD 09:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- I fixed the red links per MOS:DABRL and a critical typo, so it seems legit, there's WP:POTENTIAL. The separate issue of whether there's a primary topic doesn't have to be decided at AfD. Keep --Joy (talk) 10:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.