Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan J. Baverman (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:39, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alan J. Baverman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-aggradizingarticle about a minor US judicial officer. A Magistrate judge deals with preliminary motions and minor matters, and I think previous decisions is that the position alone does not imply notability. In addition to at most very borderline claims to notability , the article should also be deleted as self-advertising. DGG ( talk ) 21:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:17, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:17, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:JUDGE, likely fails WP:GNG, much of the article is overblown vanity so there's the NPOV failure to consider as well. SITH (talk) 23:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable magistrate judge. This is not a level that confers automatic notability and nothing else suggests notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:JUDGE. In fact, I cannot discern a claim to notability on the page, most attorneys are not notable. Nor am I seeing WP:SIGCOV. Feel free to ping me to reconsider if somebody finds sources that support notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.