Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Herrmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:35, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Herrmann[edit]

Very well-known Mexican cosmetologist?..who is this Alan Herrmann?.. No google search results for this Mexican cosmetologist!.. Also article is full of vanity information (e.g. an extremely gifted artist from an early age, ...he spends most of his leisure time at his palatial estate, Garza Blanca, near Puerto Vallarta, Mexico and his summer home in Miami Beach, Florida!!) --Abögarp 21:51, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have worked in fashion and magazines and he has a strong presence in the fashion world especially in New York. Just because you havent heard of a name doesnt mean that a person has no significance. His website is being constructed as we speak however no url has been assigned yet. xlr8tion

Comment: The above user is the original author of this article.

Monkeyman^(talk) 16:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:27, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously the name googles some 3,000,000 hits because there's lots of people named Alan or Herrman but try this google search, and you will see that he is not notable. Bobby1011 15:52, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bobby1011. Monkeyman^(talk) 16:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Bouncy Castle Hire man scores more Ghits than the cosmologist Dlyons493 Talk 20:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable, despite author's claims; also reads like WP:VSCA. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this junk.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 01:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepI have seen articles for numerous people online who are stubs. I find it quite "selective" that you are deleting articles pertaining to Mexican entrepeneurs. It took Jesus over 1,000 years to get his name heard around the world, so why not wait. I have edited articles that have numerous errors and ina ccuracies. I w ould not enter junk up on this site. (xlr8tion)

Comment "selective" in what way? Are you alleging that there's a bias against Mexicans, cosmetologists, entrepreneurs or merely people who appear not ro reach Wikipedia's criteria for verifiability, just out of interest? Tonywalton | Talk 20:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: For a bird's eye view of other articles up for the deletion process, check out Category:Pages for deletion. I'm sure very few (if not none) nominations have any sort of "selective" bias against Mexican entrepreneurs. And while the comparison to Jesus might well be tongue in cheek, I'll point out in a similar manner that even that article adhered to the notion of "notability first, article after." --Kinu ^t/_c 00:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.