Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Beckwith (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:55, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Beckwith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Could not find reliable sources about him. Natg 19 (talk) 22:05, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 22:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The guidelines says multiple significant roles in notable films or other productions. I actually am not convinced that Beckwith had any significant roles, but clearly he did not make significant roles in multiple productions. He was a one TV episode and bit part actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I'm actually being lenient with Salting this time since it seems we're safe from the blatant attempts for now, and it's not surprising because it's clear all of this is from the time we actually accepted these trivial and unconvincing subjects. Everything here is trivial and unconvincing and it's clear there's nothing better to go from here, thus all in all, delete is clear. SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A number of the roles that are mention are uncredited roles. Some are when he worked as a technician.--CaroleHenson (talk) 20:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.