Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alamo Bowl broadcasters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Alamo Bowl. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alamo Bowl broadcasters[edit]

A user created this article as a sub to Alamo Bowl. I merged them together leaving a message at Talk:Alamo Bowl, and he undid without any explanation. Since the main article is 13kb long and this stub list is only 4kb long, the main article, which is mostly lists and tables, is in no way so long as to require a split per WP:LENGTH. There is absolutely no reason why this stub list cannot be merged into the main article. Reywas92 ^Talk 18:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The user actually never split the article, the user started a new artcle, go back to the history and look it up.--Levineps (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right; maybe not on this article, but for the others you did. I WP:MERGED the two together because there is no reason for them to be separate. You simply undid me without any explanation. That's also slightly deceiving and confusing to be speaking in third person there. It was Levineps who made the article. Reywas92 ^Talk 18:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You make way too many assumptions! You need to read the history before assuming that an article was split. And also, you need to use talk page before make a significant change to an article.--Levineps (talk) 18:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I admit I'm wrong there, but you have yet to explain why the two can't be merged. Reywas92 ^Talk 18:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:26, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and Merge to Alamo Bowl.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 17:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.