Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Qaida artillery and preps camp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Al Qaida artillery and preps camp[edit]
- Al Qaida artillery and preps camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This "terrorist training camp" simply receives one mention in an official document - there's no significant coverage in reliable sources to substantiate notability per WP:GNG. Claritas § 21:39, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication that this meets the WP:GNG, or even that the article title is correct - the single governmental source that mentions this in passing speaks of "a" camp, not "the" camp. Unless non-trivial coverage can be found (and I can't find any), this should be deleted. Karanacs (talk) 13:40, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a single mention in a government report is a far cry from passing WP:N. Nsk92 (talk) 19:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As Karanacs alludes, in the source "Al Qaida artillery and preps camp" is descriptive and not a proper noun. If there were a number of these "Al Qaida artillery and preps camp"s in Afghanistan, covered and called that by reliable sources, then the descriptive term might be worthy of an article. But there's no evidence of that. First Light (talk)
- Delete, one sentence in a single source does not add up to "Significant coverage". IQinn (talk) 07:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.