Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (5th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: speedy keep due to bad faith nom by new user, possible single purpose account/vandal. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 00:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

This keep closure was endorsed by deletion review because the 4th nomination was very recent. The closer was a non-admin with a conflict of interest, however, so his accusation of bad faith is stricken. Xoloz 15:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (5th nomination)

Does not follow encyclopedic format

• Delete: Please let this nomination stand. Bad faith? I dont think so because the last two were too quickly deleted and we did not have a good count because of it. It was said most people at first keep, and later people who see this page delete. I think the page was too quickly deleted before people really read the arguements. If you don't agree fine, but thats what I see happend.

My reason for delete is that Gore III is not a public figure, and is only on here because of his arrests or his accident. He has never been mentioned on the news otherwise, and will never be heard from again unless he gets arrested again. He would not be in a 'real' encyclopedia. Thank you.--JoeWang2 00:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.