Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Markazul Islami As-Salafi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 18:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Al-Markazul Islami As-Salafi[edit]
- Al-Markazul Islami As-Salafi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not Notable Madrasa. Have no reference. and not pass WP:N - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 11:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To, Jayanta Nath Its a notable Madrasa in Bangladesh as the biggest educational institution of the sect Ahlul Hadeeth. And also Its far more famous Madrasa that many other less notable educational institutions found in Wikipedia. So I strongly support its existence here and hope anyone will develop it much more.. Thanks user: Nawfa2000
- Dear user: Nawfa2000 please go through WP:N. Famous is not the criteria for inclusion of the article. And look WP:OSE.- Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 10:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To, Jayanta Nath There are many reliable sources have been added on references area. Thats proved that Its a notable Madrasa in Bangladesh as the biggest educational institution of the sect Ahlul Hadeeth. Verify these references.. Thanks user: Gumnam rahi —Preceding undated comment added 19:41, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per our usual practice for verifiable high schools. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 13:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.