Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akram Pedramnia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Akram Pedramnia[edit]
- Akram Pedramnia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG, and fails WP:AUTHOR. I searched in Persian but couldn't find any references for the article. Most of the references of the article are the articles by subject and not on her.This article has been deleted in Persian Wikipedia.Farhikht (talk) 14:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per NOM. I had a pretty weak search as well and can't find anything to indicate notability.--NortyNort (Holla) 14:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree. The article cites no sources that are about this person. I've looked around and cannot find any sources about this person. I've read the fa: Wikipedia discussion and no-one there cited any sources about the person. The only thing that I did find, ironically, was a conspiracy theory page complaining that this article had been nominated for deletion asking for it to be challenged. It recites what this article claims, and then says "I'm unable to find much more information on her.". So even the conspiracy theorists outwith Wikipedia cannot find sources, either. ☺ Uncle G (talk) 14:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.