Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akiko Kimura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Akiko Kimura[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mega Man.exe is Akiko Kimura's only major role. That's it? Nothing else? Aside from that, there's also no news coverage or strong references, which are necessary to display the subject's notability. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete Besides starring as Megaman.EXE in the Rockman anime series, she stars as Kisaragi Ninomai, one of the teachers/main harem members in Happy Lesson, Fei Rune, a main character in Inazuma Eleven Go. Not sure how notable those two are, although Inazuma Eleven is a notable franchise in general. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We should be able to have more than one sentance in the body of an article if we are going to have it.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as all listed characters are trivial, nothing from this listed career suggests anything at all for actual independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see any notable roles so this one wouldn't even pass WP:ENT. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.