Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akiiro Renka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Purple software. (non-admin closure) — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Akiiro Renka[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Japanese visual novel that shows no notability. Was not made into an anime so no idea what it is doing over in WP:ANIME. No references or citations. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Purple software. Someone may see this game online or at a convention, so I feel it could be a search term. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:53, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 16:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Purple software per Knowledgekid87, I could find no English references. It might worth keeping if some excellent reviews in high end Japanese publications were found. But I don't have high hopes. Yvarta (talk) 23:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.