Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajeet Vishwakarma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 18:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ajeet Vishwakarma[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing indicates that the subject is notable. There were a bunch of references in the article, but I pruned out those which did not have a single mention of the subject's name. The ones which are left are not reliable sources and in any case not enough to pass WP:GNG or WP:ENT. Neither are any reliable sources available online to support notability. In addition to all the above, I suspect COI editing going on here. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Related AfDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Soi and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicky Kewat --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:54, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per my comments on the other two AfD's. Probably vanity article and possible conflict of interest involved. 1.125.48.81 (talk) 10:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

::: Conflict confirmed here. see the Vicky Kewat AfD. 1.125.48.81 (talk) 10:59, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Just because this person might be known in India, it doesn't mean it should have a Wikipedia article as there are almost no sources that can confirm his significance. – Sabbatino (talk) 09:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.