Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aivaras Bražinskas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:10, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aivaras Bražinskas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per above, has not played in a fully professional league or senior international football. Fenix down (talk) 17:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - while the top league in Lithuania may not be fully professional, player meets WP:FOOTYN as Žalgiris Vilnius is fully professional. Nfitz (talk) 03:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nfitz does not understand WP:NFOOTY, which states that a player must have played in "a fully professional league", not for a fully-professional club. The Lithuanian league is not fully professional, so he fails it. Number 5 7 23:31, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom, does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY JMHamo (talk) 15:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.