Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aishwarya Sheoran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:12, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aishwarya Sheoran[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the coverage the subject received is recent because of the rank scored in UPSC exam, it classifies as news (for a single event) and WP:NOTNEWS. The other achievement is finalist of Femina Miss India 2016, which certainly does not makes the subject notable. Zoodino (talk) 15:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 15:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 15:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Zoodino (talk) 15:10, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Run-of-the-mill model and beauty contestant. The article says that she scored 93 on what appears to be the national civil service exam, and that she was a beauty contestant. Google search shows that she exists and uses social media, and that she was a beauty contestant and that she scored 93 on what appears to be the national civil service exam. Nothing is notable about having been a finalist in a beauty contest. No context is provided as to what a score of 93 signifies or what the distribution of scores is (but the number was probably meant to dazzle or amaze rather than to inform). Robert McClenon (talk) 15:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Re: the 93, I think the editor meant a rank of 93, in the UPSC examination, which is an entry point into the Indian Administrative Service, Indian Foreign Service amongst other civil services. That said, I do support the delete recommendation, and I will add it as a separate line item to avoid confusion. Ktin (talk) 07:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of enduring notability presently. Winning a non-notable beauty pageant, and cracking Indian civil services exam, impressive, yet unremarkable (per notability). - hako9 (talk) 17:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable beauty contestant who otherwise fails under the not news guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not establish notability as of yet. I am sure the UPSC is a pathway to many impactful positions on the Indian Civil services front, and I wish the best! Cheers. Ktin (talk) 07:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have made some changes to the page. Please take a look. She has been a real inspiration for many women, in India and abroad. Please be considerate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grammybro (talk • contribs) 10:21, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Such is not part of notability or biography criteria. You haven't made any changes to the sourcing of the article. In fact, you added an unsourced statement [1]. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If she is enough of an inspiration that her being an inspiration gets mentioned with significant passages in reliable, indepdent secondary sources than we will keep this article. Unless you can find such sourcing speaking of her then we will not keep the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:51, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.79.224.39 (talk) 17:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.