Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airi Ayase
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Airi Ayase[edit]
Not notable. Would not meet the proposed WP:PORN BIO or a Japanese eqivalent, having no notable awards in Japan, or notable mainstream work, notable magazine appearances, etc etc. Would definitely fail WP:BIO if that were applied instead. Delete. --- Hong Qi Gong 14:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Tyyu6 14:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Even with googlebombing she only generates <800 hits on Google. --Nishkid64 15:03, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Googling for non-English names with English characters is somewhat biased. A google for her name in kanji yields significantly more (125,000) hits. Neier 01:34, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Regardless, Google has been determined to be an inaccurate way to determine notability of porn stars, so the point is moot. --- Hong Qi Gong 04:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The point is not moot, so long as others try to use the lack of English material to disprove notability in this, or any other, AfD. My point applies equally to google as well as other online resources such as Amazon or whatever. For articles with the name in native form in the article, I don't think that any special knowledge of Japanese (or Arabic, or Chinese) is necessary to copy/paste it into google to get a more accurate representation. Whether or not the numbers mean anything is another matter. I hope that people do a modicum of research before voting on these discussions; but, if the research has a basic flaw or inherent bias, then it needs to be pointed out. Neier 06:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Regardless, Google has been determined to be an inaccurate way to determine notability of porn stars, so the point is moot. --- Hong Qi Gong 04:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete My above comment notwithstanding, she does not appear to be notable. Neier 06:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.