Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air China Flight 1350

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. General consensus that "Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a newspaper" policy applies. — Satori Son 19:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Air China Flight 1350[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable aviation incident. WP:NOTNEWS applies....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete,. I added another ref from a more reliable English source but I agree this does not rise to the level of notability or significance we expect for an article. --JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 22:02, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
keep, Meets WP:GNG. Notable, has significant coverage in Chinese language media, multiple WP:RS. Per WP:GNG "Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language.". Xinbenlv (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC) (WP:COI I am the page creator.)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unless the pen was poisoned, this seems like a non-notable example of air rage. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTNEWS - no casualty and no lasting significance. -Zanhe (talk) 17:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteWP:NOTNEWS. Acnetj (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – minor disturbance by a psychiatric patient; no casualties, no damage, no lasting effects, and no encyclopedic significance. --Deeday-UK (talk) 18:29, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:NOTNEWS. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Plenty of events will have their few minutes of news attention without any lasting significance whatsoever. /Julle (talk) 10:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.