Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Castles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Notability doesn't appear to be met, per WP:MUSIC here Tony Fox (arf!) 05:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Air Castles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable band. None of the the criteria at WP:MUSIC are met: one EP release on a non-notable label. Their music was aparrently used in a skating video entered into a competition but that is still well short of criterion #10 at WP:MUSIC. I42 (talk) 07:27, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the article about one of the band members for the same reasons:

Keep. The band appears to pass the touring criterion of WP:MUSIC. Its website says: "The EP has received praise worldwide and has helped Air Castles to play in Spain, tour the UK, achieve a US licensing contract and get endorsements from Orange Amplifiers and Roland." A list of shows appears at http://aircastlesmusic.com/ -- Eastmain (talk) 08:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(ec with J04n below) I do not see that this has been met: the requirement is for "non-trivial coverage in a reliable source of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country". I failed to find anything other than primary sources or event listings. I42 (talk) 18:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk) 08:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find enough to qualify for WP:BAND, the best WP:3PARTY I could find is this and multiple sources are needed. All allmusic has is a tracklist for their EP. Their tour doesn't qualify for criterion 4 unless it has "non-trivial coverage in a reliable source", a mention on their website just isn't enough. If someone can dig up anything else I would be happy to change my !vote. J04n(talk page) 18:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both for clearly failing WP:MUSIC. LibStar (talk) 22:49, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:02, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.