Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Canada Flight 875

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 21:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Air Canada Flight 875[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable happened here. There were no injuries or fatalities, the plane number was not retired - all in all, this is just a minor hiccup, not an incident. Fails WP:EVENT and also doesn't really meet WP:AIRCRASH. Beerest355 Talk 23:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 23:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 23:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Beerest355 Talk 23:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & Comment Do keep in mind that WP:AIRCRASH is not a Wikipedia policy, but a guideline for the participants of WikiProject Aviation on articles covering Airplane crashes. It alone should not be the basis for an AfD. However, I cannot find any sufficient sources or coverage on this incident to pass WP:N or WP:EVENT outside the investigation report (here: http://www.fss.aero/accident-reports/dvdfiles/CA/2002-06-14-CA.pdf) and this coverage is WP:ROUTINE, so I would say delete. Jguy _Talk^Done 00:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh yeah, I'm aware of that. That's why I put WP:EVENT first. Beerest355 Talk 00:33, 18 June 2013 (UTC
- WP:ONLYESSAY. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:07, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:AIRCRASH. Not notable....William 00:37, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, also per WP:NOTNEWS. Tailstrikes occur frequently, and this article reads like a random news item.--FoxyOrange (talk) 05:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable just a bad day at the office. MilborneOne (talk) 18:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.