Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirTags (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 09:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AirTags[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:RUMOUR and convention, products not yet officially announced, even if anticipated, do not warrant a Wikipedia article. Could draftify till official release. Highly anticipated and almost-certain to be released products such as the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPhone 12 set the precedent for deletion. 17jiangz1 (talk) 13:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. 17jiangz1 (talk) 13:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as in first deletion debate on the overwhelming strength of tier-one English language reliable sources. WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST explains why appealing to precedent is fraught even in an apples-to-apples comparison. This is not even such an apples-to-apples situation wrt iPhone 12; it is a new product line, not an incremental edition, creating an entire new location-based network ecosystem and a Pandora's box of privacy and security considerations, as well as monopoly concerns and lawsuits noted by the sources. ☆ Bri (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - content is reliably sourced and per WP:CRYSTAL, predictions stated by reliable sources in the field (which is the case) are allowed Eyebeller (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 17:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - Did you even take into consideration that this was kept after an AfD a mere three months ago? Okay, it was No Consensus, but that's essentially just Keep. Foxnpichu (talk) 21:57, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per all above. Sliekid (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.