Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ainsley Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 04:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ainsley Brooks[edit]

This has been speedied four times as utterly unverifiable. No IMDB entry for him or the alleged upcoming films, no evidence to support the sundry speculations. Complete bollocks, frankly. Just zis Guy you know? 22:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. Re-creating a speedied article is also vandalism. --Tony St 22:05, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this. Rob Church 22:22, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Craziness. --Fuzzie (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DONT DELETE This person is a real person and has been in these TV titles, please do not delete this article, as there is not enough data yet.. User:Becky-RE-fan 22:34, 18 March 2006
Dont Delete - i just found some stuff of him on www.bbc.co.uk/eastenders about him as an extra. ~~emtry2004 22:39~~— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.2.28.16 (talk • contribs) 22:32, March 18, 2006 (same IP as the above entry signed by article creator and reincarnator Becky-REfan) Just zis Guy you know? 22:59, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per jzg ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 22:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do delete per above - and you can't vote twice --Khoikhoi 22:48, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Joe 22:49, 18 March 2006 (UTC) (I also removed a second vote by User:Becky-RE-fan, inamsuch as the vote didn't add anything to the discussion; it simply restated the position already expressed above).[reply]
Delete per my reasons at talk:Ainsley Brooks. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 22:54, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 23:08, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:V unless sources can be added to the article. — orion eight (talk) 23:22, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.