Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimetis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 19:15, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aimetis[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested speedy deletion. This non-notable back office tech business is described in the article as a software company offering integrated intelligent video management solutions for security surveillance and business intelligence applications. Not sure enough about what that might mean to try to clarify it, though it does sound rather sinister. Unambiguous advertising (ooh, its products are integrated and intelligent ... solutions!) that makes absolutely no claim in-text to subminimal importance: the only claim of notability is a petty trade award from a consulting firm. At any rate, nothing here suggests historical, technical, or cultural significance or long term historical notability. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 11:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.
Speedy delete This is nothing but advertising. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 23:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Ad spam disguised as a WP article... Carrite (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I wish there were more speedy criteria for unreferenced spam. Miami33139 (talk) 07:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Advertising spam, another corperation trying to advertise itself on wikipedia--Lerdthenerd (talk) 08:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I see nothing here indicating notability and I cannot find any reliable sources to establish same. Transmissionelement (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.