Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aimee Moran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:13, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aimee Moran[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and SNG (NBAD). No coverage found online. Timothytyy (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Badminton, and Wales. Timothytyy (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sigcov 1. Stvbastian (talk) 11:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An interview is a primary source. Routine Google search does not bring up a source meeting WP:GNG, therefore delete.
Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not a primary source. The article provide an author own thinking based on primary sources, and written through editor edits. Stvbastian (talk) 23:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It does contain a lot of non-quote material, but it also fails independence because it is published by the Badminton Wales and material from governing sports orgs is explicitly rejected from counting toward notability. JoelleJay (talk) 00:43, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lacks sufficient coverage to pass notability guidelines. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV. The above mentioned source is from the National Governing Body for Badminton in Wales and thus is not independent of the subject Alvaldi (talk) 20:24, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find anything better than the Badminton Wales source already discussed above Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:12, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a few news references to the page. I am not prepared to argue that this coverage is sufficiently notable, but I wanted to point out that there is at least some independent coverage outside the governing sports organization. IdRatherBeAtTheBeach (talk) 18:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For evaluation of the last-minute addition of references.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:45, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Cardiffian is a few paragraphs about a tournament, with one line mentioning her. The Cuban site is the same. Other source is trivial coverage. Nothing found for notability either. Oaktree b (talk) 14:54, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no sources providing SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. DreamRimmer (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.