Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aidan O'Rourke (musician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing this slightly early, because the nominator has withdrawn the nomination and the remaining delete !vote has been sufficiently countered by the provision of sources herein. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 09:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aidan O'Rourke (musician)[edit]

Aidan O'Rourke (musician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSIC. The Daily Record article is insufficient to be considered "multiple, non-trivial, published works" as per criterion 1, and the awards received are not major enough to be considered to pass criterion 8. LukeSurl t c 16:23, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non-notable as per WP:SIGCOV. Quis separabit? 19:12, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Qwfp (talk) 14:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. His commission for New Music 20x12 indicates notability and received significant coverage. --Deskford (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. In addition to the above sources, here are two Allmusic reviews [5][6]. Given the coverage on the whole, this person appears to meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.  Gongshow   talk 18:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks to everyone providing new sources. I see Aidan O'Rourke meets the GNG. I'm happy to withdraw this nomination. Perhaps these sources could be incorporated into the article? --LukeSurl t c 10:14, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.