Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahnabith Gish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahnabith Gish[edit]

Ahnabith Gish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Article with advertorial overtones about band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC, and no evidence of passing WP:GNG -- the referencing here is entirely to dead links in their own hometown media, and no stronger sourcing is locatable on Google or ProQuest. As always, a band is not entitled to permanently keep an article just because they exist(ed?) -- reliable source coverage, demonstrating something which would objectively pass an NMUSIC criterion, is required. Bearcat (talk) 23:52, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete an unremarkable music band; fails NMUSIC and significant RS coverage cannot be found to meet GNG. Article tagged "Notability" since 2008. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:28, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as it stands - I'm willing to be convinced, but what stands out on Googling the name is that I don't even see them much in unreliable sources, let alone reliable ones - David Gerard (talk) 01:11, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.