Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Shaaek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Shaaek[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable business person. Being the marketing manager of a professional football club is not inherently notable, nor is having completed some certificate course (even if you're the first from your country to do so). The sources offer only passing mentions, or are primary, hence fails WP:GNG / WP:BIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- The people of this article is largely and exclusively featured in almost every references which proves his notability. Not only by local newspapers, he has been officially featured by UEFA on their Academy website and social media accounts. Besides, he is not only a business person or marketing manager, he is also connected to Bangladesh Football Federation, a sports governing body of a country, as a board member. He has also two coaching licences. All of these staffs are quite enough to pass WP:GNG. So, keep. Diptadg17 (talk) 08:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability, all coverage appears to be ROUTINE. Giant Snowman 10:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. Mccapra (talk) 12:19, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject does not passes WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage where addresses the topic directly and in detail. Other than some passing/single mentions, no significant coverage in Bengali either. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 15:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:GNG, lacks sigcov CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:45, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Of the references, one is to LinkedIn, many are to unrelated sources (i.e. to the page for the certificate program itself, rather than to anything mentioning him), and none of them seem to indicate notability. jp×g 03:19, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only unrealiable routine coverage. Sonofstar (talk) 19:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.