Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmadpanu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete: speedy or snowy, take your pick. Geschichte (talk) 09:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmadpanu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be about a 21- year old member of the Pakistani military without any real notability. MB 17:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. MB 17:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MB 17:42, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hoax. Highly doubtful the Pakistan Army would enlist 8-year-olds, let alone give them positions like SSG Commando. Dl2000 (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be a hoax. Claims e.g. to be director general of the "Federal Criminal Intelligence Agency". No such agency appears to exist, with the closest match being Federal Investigation Agency which the subject most definitely is not the director general of. -Ljleppan (talk) 19:16, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Dl2000 ビッグツリ64 (talk) 22:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete via WP:G3 as a hoax.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominated image for deletion on commons.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:G3. snood1205 22:25, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, for the reasons already listed. Adding this comment to point out for the closing admin that the main editor's username is.... Ahmadpanu. Do as you will with that. -- asilvering (talk) 23:30, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that as well. There's a note on the author's talk page about have a WP:COI, but there was no real acknowledgment of that by the editor. snood1205 03:04, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Though one can hardly be said to have a COI when the article is itself a hoax... -- asilvering (talk) 04:29, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as a hoax.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete obvious hoax. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 21:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
delete, Can't believe he was recruited when he was 8., Alex-h (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.