Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Sheibani Nia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:36, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Sheibani Nia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing at all for actual independent notability and substance since he's simply a locally known and active orthodontist (a career in itself quite rarely notable, unless actually significant) and the memberships and honors are simply trivial and unconvincing, none of which are outstandingly major. Everything else shows no actual signs of a notable article and there's clear advertising motivations here. SwisterTwister talk 03:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Merely being credited with patents doesn't establish notability. I've also warned the article's creator for copyright violations to multiple articles. Primary intent is promotional, and it's fair to assume WP:COI is in play. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:47, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete and Salt per A7. Article has been previously deleted here. This is a recreation with different capitalization in the title. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:18, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Article Admin Answer~~

~~For every title in This article there are plenty of strong sources, and if anyone believes there is only one violating adress it first. before that please remove the tag for delition article~~ - Block evasion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:51, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.