Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Nabeel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Redoing the original close by BD2412 for technical reasons. – Joe (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Nabeel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable science person, links are primary sources, confirmation of where they've worked or appear to be SEO sites. Nothing of note found. Oaktree b (talk) 15:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Medicine. Oaktree b (talk) 15:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - mainly because he is the recipient of the Innovators Under 35 award by MIT, inventor of Klens, and was appointed as the state ambassador for Kuwait Vision 2035. This leads me to believe that he has substantial notability. Coverage is in major Kuwaiti newspapers such as Kuwait Times ([1]), Arab Times ([2]), Al-Anba ([3], [4]), Al Qabas ([5]), or TV such as Al Majlis, or govenment publication [6]. His research has been covered by Arabian Business ([7]) and MIT Technology Review ([8]). The nominator's hint that these are SEO sites is egregious. There is much more about him in Arabic. Veltkemp (talk) 04:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. WP:NEXIST: appears to be very notable. His biography has been included in the Arabic language curriculum in all of Kuwait's schools. More coverage found: [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. 142.189.8.164 (talk) 16:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:GNG. The person who loves reading (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Like to see more assessment of the sources provided.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:19, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No comments since last relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist, it would be nice to hear from some editors experienced at AFD discussions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I manually assessed the first three sources, they are independent and significant (never heard of these news sources before but I didn't find any outstanding problems). This person got a lot of coverage for his breakthrough "Klens" and received the aforementioned international award, which should meet WP:NACADEMIC #2. While this isn't exactly an academic I believe it's close enough, and the sources should meet GNG. Also they definitely aren't SEO sites. Aaron Liu (talk) 00:34, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.