Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Milad Karimi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) talk to !dave 12:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Milad Karimi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PAID, WP:COI Gujimall (talk) 06:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve, clearly notable per WP:BIO. He's probably also per WP:ACADEMIC, though citation count in GScholar is low: I don't currently have access to the reliable tools for properly checking academic notability. Nominator should have read the deletion criteria carefully WP:BEFORE nominating this article for deletion, as WP:COI and WP:PAID are issues that can be fixed, and not grounds for deletion. The Mighty Glen (talk) 08:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Eminently notable enough to pass WP:NPROF. I dont see any WP:COI. A simple search will verify his bona fides. scope_creep (talk) 08:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:PROF, well sourced. Also this is vague nomination from an account whose only mainspace edit is one PROD of another good article and this misnomation. –Ammarpad (talk) 10:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep This shouldn't have even been nominated, and the same goes for the other seemingly random article which the nominator prodded. And the "joker" sandbox edits are just weird. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.