Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahimsaism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete both as failing to make any credible (or intelligible) claim of notability. Guy (Help!) 22:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahimsaism[edit]

Self-promotion; very few Google hits _SUBWAYguy 18:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable self promotion. Does not cite any reference sources for verification, pretty much original research publication. --Eqdoktor 18:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Prod'er. I get three google hits, of which two are press release hits. About as non-notable as something can be and still exist at all. Seems to be a movement consisting of one non-notable artist (Ignatius xavier joseph, whose article should probably be added to this AFD). Fan-1967 18:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not sure how to add another article to this AFD; it would be fine if someone went ahead and did that _SUBWAYguy 19:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Fan-1967 19:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Heck, I'd support a Speedy under G1 as patent nonsense; this is all but gibberish. Ravenswing 19:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - as per above; was there one actual sentence in there??? Marked as db-nonsense. SkierRMH 20:43, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.