Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aheliotech

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aheliotech[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Few sources; stub; may be advertising Cssiitcic (talk) 00:21, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails wp:Corp, no significant independent coverage around. Being a stub is never a good reason to delete. --Claritas § 09:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete Fails WP:ORG, very minor computer repair shop. scope_creep (talk) 19:49, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No mentions in WP:RS from what I can tell. Looking through Google News showed nothing. ffm is now L Faraone 20:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.