Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agryd.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 07:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agryd.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources demonstrating WP:CORP or WP:WEB whatsoever, just press releases. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Google search turns up exclusively promotional material in the first 100 results. I saw no evidence that this site was ever mentioned in an independent reliable source. This might even fall under speedy deletion for advertising. Daß Wölf (talk) 01:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to promotional tone. Alexius08 (talk) 02:57, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Given references are start-up coverage, mostly written by the firm and their PR reps. Nothing better found and I note that its Alexa rating in its home market is 36,605, which doesn't contradict my view that this is at best WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NWEB. AllyD (talk) 07:07, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, did not find any independent reliable sources about the subject, so does not meet notability standards.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.