Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agra (given name)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:02, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agra (given name)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed. This name fails WP:NNAME as having no Wikipedia articles about people with the name, and having failed NNAME fails WP:GNG as having no WP:SIGCOV and having hardly any reliable sources outside of simple databases. It might even fail WP:NOTDICT. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 06:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Lists of people, and Latvia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: the only information is that a few hundred people have that name. The only person listed is redlinked. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 16:10, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as this article has been PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:59, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No indication this meets the WP:NNAME, with a lack of coverage either in the article or elsewhere. Let'srun (talk) 18:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, namecruft. Geschichte (talk) 19:39, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet WP:NNAME. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The references in the article are enough to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 10:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how. A few mentions in databases, calendars and frivolous sources of questionable reliability does not seem to indicate notability. And the sources you added are about the person listed, so I don't see how they contribute towards notability of the name itself. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.