Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ageless Fantasy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Slow speedy, spam StarM 02:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ageless Fantasy[edit]

This article is really an advertisement for a product that has no established notability. The article references a number of scientific sources, but none of them have any direct relationship to this product, so the way they are used constitutes original synthesis. An earlier version was speedied as an advert. All of the editing done by the creator of this article appears to be promotional in nature. Looie496 (talk) 22:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete promo of a new (2008) fragrance. - 7-bubёn >t 22:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (G11) as you-know-what from Hormel. It's like one of those two-page-long advertisements masqueraded as articles you find in magazines (or even those Amish furniture things you find in the major newspapers). There is also a relevant thread regarding the POV/spam/whatever-pushing of the editors involved at Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents#User:Browncom. MuZemike 02:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Del g11. In addition, the pseudoscience in there's mindboggling. it's craptacular adcopy nonsense. Aroma molecule vibrating in the infrared are smelled differently by the brain, which sits outside the head. kerfuck? ThuranX (talk) 05:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.