Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agama Yoga
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Keeper ǀ 76 20:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agama Yoga[edit]
- Agama Yoga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable religious organization. Also, no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 19:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 19:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 19:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This Article Should not be deleted for the following reasons: Tomeryogi (talk) 15:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Regarding notability it has been decided that the article about Swami vivekananda Saraswati should be merged to Agama Yoga, though independantly they lack notability "together there should be anough sources" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Swami_Vivekananda_Saraswati Tomeryogi (talk) 15:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Regarding "no reliable source", the article has refferences to 3rd party sources, as written in the discussion page those wishing to view them may contact me. Tomeryogi (talk) 15:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read "Swami Vivekananda Saraswati notability issue" in the discussion page for more specific reasons - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Agama_Yoga Tomeryogi (talk) 15:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am the article's primary author Tomeryogi (talk) 15:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The result of the Afd discussion on Swami Vivekananda Saraswati was to merge into the Agama Yoga article because he is not notable. Like its founder, Agama Yoga is also not notable. There needs to be reliable sources provided that demonstrate how the subject is notable. As there are none, this article should be deleted. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 14:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The article title leads a user to believe thta it is a "type of yoga". However the article does not reveal anything different about it. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 14:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fraudulent topic. Annaklein92 (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The Fact that the article's name may or may not need changing is irrelevant for the discussion regarding if the article should be kept or deleted, i invite you to open a discussion regarding the article's name in the articles talk page Tomeryogi (talk) 06:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Swami Vivekananda Saraswati himself is not notable, and this is not a type of Yoga, its a promotional ad that is using Wikipedia as a vehicle. Wikidās ॐ 12:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.