Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Silence(2015)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After Silence(2015)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of adequate notability. Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails general notability guidelines and WP:NFILM. This article was just deleted as an expired PROD. This recreation still has no sources. The only After Silence film I could find any was a short film on rape and not this film. Jbh ^Talk 13:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 14:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 14:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I have added a single database-like entry from a film festival and a Youtube trailer, but that's about all I can find. Fails NFILM and GNG. -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I have found the same results as Sam Sailor, and it is not enough to establish notability. The Afghan Film Festival itself does not appear very notable (if at all), so it is not surprising that films at a festival of minor note would not garner much coverage. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 15:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I had PRODded this earlier today having found no evidence of any notability. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 16:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It had been deleted via expired PROD just a few days ago [1]. I wish there were an easy way to see if an article is a recreation, I would not have noticed it if the article was not still on my watch list from the last PROD. Cheers. Jbh ^Talk 17:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and above. I didn't have any luck searching in the language of the latter half of the Youtube external link within the article either.—Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 18:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.