Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Nine series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After Nine series[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about three recently uploaded amateur web videos, each 10-14 minutes long. Many references and external links, but none to reliable sources or to evidence for encyclopedic notability (see Wikipedia:Notability (web)). HaeB (talk) 00:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No third-party reliable sources, not notable. —Mike Allen 07:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete: I have explored the links and found a page with over 1300 fans. Another "Not by creator" page with over 200. It does appear this is a new thing but with the amount of people who view the program it is unlikely to be duped. Actor reference pages seem valid as does the site and program itself. I'm new to this entire thing but think this page was written by a third party and sticks to the facts. — —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stickyfeature (talk • contribs) 10:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC) — Stickyfeature (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Above is the third edit by the article's creator. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:10, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - Can't find anything to establish notability. No news or book results. Google web just comes up with a myspace and facebook page and of course a bazillion hits for phrases like "(...) was cancelled after nine series". If "a page with over 1300 fans" would be a reason to keep an article, we might as well start writing biographies for everyone who takes facebook too seriously. Smocking (talk) 19:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First: I am not this page's creator. Just a fan from the page. — —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stickyfeature (talk • contribs) 21:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC) [reply]

You're right about one thing: the article was created by single-purpose account William James Arthur; you only seems to have become the primary contributor later. Still don't see any evidence of notability though. Please see WP:GNG and WP:WEB and see if you can come up with some reliable evidence of notability (not popularity). We've already done our best to find it, but were unsuccessful and without it this article has about as much chance as a snowball in hell to be around next week. Smocking (talk) 03:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete AbbaIkea2010 (talk) 23:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.