Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aftek (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aftek[edit]

Aftek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. It may be a listed company, but it lacks significant coverage WP:SIGCOV. Hatchens (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 09:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Good catch! Can't find any in-depth reliable sources. Plus, I checked the history and the article was started by an employee of the company for which they were given an "Award for Marketing"! Utterly non-notable MaysinFourty (talk) 15:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:NCORP. Routine coverage of a middling company. Bearian (talk) 22:31, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.