Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afrozoodle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was afrozoodle with extreme prejudice, i.e speedy delete. Kimchi.sg (talk) 09:44, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Afrozoodle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism E Wing (talk) 04:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

delete unreferenced unknown coinage. Ulad (talk) 05:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above. Wikipedia is not a dictionary either. Maybe it would fit into Urban Dictionary, but nothing special there. ~~Bigtop~~ みんな空の下 (トーク) 06:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as nonsense. Two Ghits: one Wikipedia, one mirror. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, the creator hasn't even been on Wikipedia for a month and had already been blocked for making nonsensical articles. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:12, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Nonsense. Taroaldo (talk) 07:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.