Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African American Evolution in media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

African American Evolution in media[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One source which is unrelated. I found this on uncategorizedpages. (Speaking of uncategorizedpages, why do we need the uncategorized tag when there's already a special page?) KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Representation of African Americans in media. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Plain old Delete I wouldn't even merge this to Representation of African Americans in media. It looks fairly unsalvageable to me. --FuzzyGopher (talk) 04:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unsourced essay, not an encyclopedia article. There's nothing worth merging here. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can barely discern what the article is about, but I suppose it's something like "Evolution of representation of African Americans in the media". The title makes no sense at all, does not represent the content of the article and is not a suitable encyclopedic topic. The article itself is an irredeemable mess. Mduvekot (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree that there is nothing worth merging here at all; just original research with no value to Wikipedia Spiderone 09:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.