Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African American Defense League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

African American Defense League[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS. This article was created in the aftermath of the 2016 shooting of Dallas police officers because of the group's apparently violent anti-police ideology, which is reflected in the WP:RS. However, all of the coverage on this group seems to have dropped off completely after news coverage of the Dallas shooting died down. I cannot find any RS talking about this group that was published more recently, or before the Dallas shooting occurred, or something that is completely independent of the Dallas shooting. Therefore, I don't really believe this topic can stand on its own merit. Love of Corey (talk) 20:50, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of notability. The sources cited are generally not about African American Defense League and tend to only incidentally mention it. Therefore, they do not contribute to notability because they are not "significant coverage" within the meaning of GNG. To the extent that the article is about Mauricelm-Lei Millere, there are also BIO1E concerns. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 20:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a clear violation of not news guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.