Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afghan parliamentary election, 1949

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Afghan parliamentary election, 1949[edit]

At first, one year (1952 or 1949) is wrong, then the articles has no sources, then, the first afghan parliamentary election took place in 1931, so at least half of the article is wrong--Antemister (talk) 20:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think the only issue with this might be the title. It's difficult to determine the "official" name (if there was one) of historic elections in nations with languages other than English. This was a national parliamentary election so it certainly is notable. I added a source regarding the year with some other content. More sources can be found here.--Oakshade (talk) 18:32, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It seems there was elections in both 1949 and 1952. ^walk victor falk^talk 12:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There was an election in Afghanistan in 1949, per THIS SOURCE page 9. That's an encyclopedia-worthy topic. This is a terrible stub article, but that's correctible through the normal editing process. The question is whether this is an inclusion-worthy topic and it is. Carrite (talk) 05:24, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I Recommand translating the german version (was forced to write one because someone created a wrong stub there)--Antemister (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.