Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeroprakt A-32 Vixxen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn; the RAA source found by Ahunt satisfies NAIR. (non-admin closure) Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 13:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroprakt A-32 Vixxen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to fail WP:NAIR (no claim of notability, and existence is not enough). Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 14:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's article about quite new light aircraft type. I will add information and reference till end of this week. --Jin (talk) 15:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Hunting the Vixxen' article by Anrew Murray in Australasian Sport Pilot September 2015 Vol 49 Magazine cab be reference --Jin (talk) 15:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nominator is incorrect! ALL aircraft are probably notable by dint of existence. So as long as they aren't hoaxes they are notable; just need a citation and they are acceptable!!!!--Petebutt (talk) 22:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that is not what it says at WP:NAIR. Although fairly lenient about which aircraft types are presumed notable, it specifically contradicts your claim that "ALL aircraft are probably notable by dint of existence". Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 09:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - While the article currently lacks third party refs, the cover story on it in a major aviation publication establishes notability. I will add the ref to the article. - Ahunt (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Ahunt (talk) 11:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Notification of the existence of this AfD has been made at WikiProject Aviation and WikiProject Aircraft, within whose scope this article falls. - Ahunt (talk) 11:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The inclusion of the Sportpilot article seems enough to meet the notability requirement. I'll have a look in this year's (16/17) Jane's the next time I go to the library, though it may have shown up too late for inclusion.TSRL (talk) 12:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.