Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeris (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Feline infectious peritonitis#In film. King of ♠ 06:13, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aeris (film)[edit]

Aeris (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded, however it's an unremarkable short film which won two minor awards. Other than promotional articles, no in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't meet WP:NFILM. And my apologies, I originally prodded this article, not realizing that it had already been prodded, and the earlier prod was removed. Onel5969 TT me 11:30, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • KEEP - Notable film. Also taking into account the cat lover scene, more notable than some folks can fathom. Original Proposed deletion was inaccurate as well. OK, so it's now been nominated for deletion. Oh well.
Thanks Karl Twist (talk) 12:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 13:38, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, the awards won are minor and not notable, independent coverage in reliable sources is not significant. signed, Rosguill talk 18:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reply to the above. Quote: "Delete per nom". The problem is that info in the deletion nomination by the nominator is erroneous with "it's an unremarkable short film which won two minor awards". Also the use of the word " unremarkable" is an opinion and can give a prejudicial slant to the debate. While it is correct that it is a short film and runs for 30 mins approx., that in no way makes it less notable! And Wikipedia proves short films can be notable. Wikipedia has a page for them. Nominator said that it only won two minor awards. Well, that's incorrect! It actually won an award at the 2018 Garden State Festival. It was inner in the Narrative Short category. It also was a winner in the same category at the Canada International Film Festival. It was also a Gold Kahuna winner at the 2018 Honolulu Film Awards. Regarding coverage. Well, two of the references come from Google News. Both are used for other articles in Wikipedia. They are Pop Dust and WGN Radio. And Steve Dale, the host of WGN talks about it elsewhere. And for cat lovers and followers of Cat media and cat news by The Purrington Post etc this is very important. Another thing. It played at Laemmle Theatres as well some time back. This is the very first ever film about Feline infectious peritonitis.
Thanks Karl Twist (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to the closing admin. If by chance you determine that the consensus is to delete, I wonder if the history could please be preserved and the film redirected to Feline infectious peritonitis as this is an important film. It is the very first film about the condition and I know will be referred to more in the future. Personally I think it's notable enough but I'll leave it up to you. Thanks Karl Twist (talk) 12:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.