Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aerial combat engagements between Cyprus and Turkey
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. An element of original research, but I don't see how the individual items don't fail WP:NOT#NEWS anyway. Black Kite 00:37, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Aerial combat engagements between Cyprus and Turkey[edit]
- Aerial combat engagements between Cyprus and Turkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, misleading title (no combat occurred), orphaned article Socrates2008 (Talk) 12:17, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to "aerial incidents" Two events reach borderline notability for having a separate article at best. Collect (talk) 12:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename per Collect. I'm unconvinced that these incidents fail WP:N. That said, "combat" did not occur, so renaming is very appropriate. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:07, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Putting incidents together to create an article is WP:Original research. Sorry to be so blunt, but I have nothing much more to say. Except that if the incidents are notable each should have its own article. Northwestgnome (talk) 17:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – the topic as such does not meet the notability requirements, and the incidents by themselves are also not notable. --Lambiam 21:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.